Closed dtzWill closed 3 years ago
Oops, thanks for the notice. Fixed now.
Let me know if you figure out the Content-Disposition
matter.
Thank you! Much appreciated! Will let you know if I sort out or find evidence that Content-Disposition is important to be set some particular way for some use cases we care about.
Take care!
Cleanup in d0cd94026cf13a90e4fa2e67065b86b03e2c310f seems to have lost the fix for #52 :(.
Could this be restored?
Would it make sense to also include a "Content-Disposition" one way or the other (attachment vs inline), like
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
?Between reading the RFC's and quick-sampling notmuch/astroid/xapian/etc. test mail corpi (corpus-es) +my own mail, I'm not sure what behavior is really best here. So maybe nevermind on this aspect :). Mentioning because maybe (maybe!) adding such a line is easier than plumbing support for parameters or something, but not sure it can replace adding
name="signature.asc"
to the "Content-Type" line as done previously.Anyway, thanks for all your work! (can't wait to rebuild with the latest goodness like alt+key support!! :D)