Open warrencxw opened 2 years ago
Agree that the line could be changed to split fullCommand:String
for better uniformity, but as it is, it can also be interpreted as "splitting the String called fullCommand", which is what was intended. Thus, it wouldn't cause much confusion unless you read too much into it.
Team chose [severity.VeryLow
]
Originally [severity.Low
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
split fullCommand String
is an invalid syntax for method calls. As a developer, I would be really confused when referencing this sequence diagram, wondering if the method called here issplit
,fullCommand
,splitFullCommandString
? Or isfullCommand
just aString
object here?