Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
I agree with you, that would make a lot of sense. Ideally, I think the table
should
let you click on a header field to sort by that column, like pretty much every
other
piece of software in the world does.
Just to make sure I'm looking at the same window you are, you're talking about
the
"List Manager" window, right?
Original comment by peerbloc...@gmail.com
on 26 Aug 2009 at 8:08
Original comment by peerbloc...@gmail.com
on 26 Aug 2009 at 8:08
Yes, I'm talking about the List Manager. And generally, the user should be able
to
sort by any column but the default should be by the description. I don't think
this
is so difficult to implement, as the whole window redesign is.
Original comment by XhmikosR
on 26 Aug 2009 at 8:53
Is this really difficult to implement? I mean I have 12 lists and it looks bad
the
way the lists are sorted now. In the List manager and in the Update window.
Original comment by XhmikosR
on 16 Sep 2009 at 3:39
It actually isn't as trivial as you might think, as the lists are currently
entirely
unsorted. The order in which they're displayed is 1. static lists, 2. dynamic
lists,
in the order they were added to (or enabled in) the List Manager.
Still, it shouldn't be too difficult to implement. Targetting for 1.0 since
we'll
likely be posting one more Release Candidate prior to generating Public Release
1.0.
Original comment by peerbloc...@gmail.com
on 19 Sep 2009 at 10:52
This issue was closed by revision r176.
Original comment by peerbloc...@gmail.com
on 27 Sep 2009 at 4:14
While we're not sorting lists as you add them, we are at least sorting them by
URL as
we enter/leave the List Manager window. So other than when you're initially
adding
custom lists, all dynamic (i.e. URL-based) lists should be sorted by URL now.
Original comment by peerbloc...@gmail.com
on 27 Sep 2009 at 4:16
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
XhmikosR
on 26 Aug 2009 at 3:05