search

wasmCloud / wash

WAsmcloud SHell - the comprehensive command-line tool for wasmCloud development
https://wasmcloud.com
Apache License 2.0
148 stars 58 forks source link

[BUG] Installation on Fedora (35) is broken #260

Closed rrichardson closed 1 year ago

rrichardson commented 2 years ago

Describe the bug

The biggest issue is that once wasmCloud_core repo is configured on my system, it doesn't seem to contain the wash package. I'm not a yum expert, so I'm not sure how to best diagnose that. Presumably there just isn't a release for f35?

Additionally, there is no pygpgme package. I installed it using pip3 but the script doesn't detect that and the installation fails. Since that fails, it configures the yum repos to not do gpg checks, which means the repos won't be available, by default, to be utilized on an F35 system.

After reconfiguring the repos to use gpg, I was confident that my system was searching the wasmCloud repos, but it still failed to find wash.

To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Be massochistic enough to run Fedora 35
  2. Run 
    curl -s https://packagecloud.io/install/repositories/wasmcloud/core/script.rpm.sh | sudo bash
sudo dnf install wash

Expected behavior I expected the sudo dnf install wash command to complete successfully and deliver a lovely binary for me to use.

Screenshots

λ sudo dnf install wash
wasmCloud_core                                                                                                                                                                             5.4 kB/s | 3.9 kB     00:00
Importing GPG key 0x1E5DBC25:
 Userid     : "https://packagecloud.io/wasmCloud/wascc (https://packagecloud.io/docs#gpg_signing) <support@packagecloud.io>"
 Fingerprint: C20C 6434 A894 33B0 DA4B 1049 F91B 982D 1E5D BC25
 From       : https://packagecloud.io/wasmCloud/core/gpgkey
Is this ok [y/N]: y
wasmCloud_core                                                                                                                                                                             238  B/s | 296  B     00:01
No match for argument: wash
Error: Unable to find a match: wash

Environment (please complete the following information) running zsh

λ uname -a
Linux ip-10-254-1-13.us-east-2.compute.internal 5.16.18-200.fc35.x86_64 #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Mar 28 14:10:07 UTC 2022 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Additional context Add any other context about the problem here.

brooksmtownsend commented 2 years ago

Interesting, I think we should have a release set for this. Let me see if I can reproduce 👍🏻

In the meantime if you're looking to get it installed, once you have a Rust toolchain installed you can do cargo install wash-cli to get wash. That can get you unblocked in the short term 🙂

rrichardson commented 2 years ago

cargo install wash-cli to get wash

cargo install is my default choice. I just figured I'd test the Fedora installation.

I almost think that because of cargo install I'm not sure if the .rpm is even necessary, since the installation instructions recommend installing Rust before wash

I guess there might be enterprise customers who want to distribute wash or there might be scenarios where people need wash but not Rust? Not sure.

brooksmtownsend commented 2 years ago
image

This might be why... looks like we release up to Fedora 32 🙂 We'll just have to up that to newer versions of Fedora.

The deb/rpm instructions are something we'd like to be used as a default and then fallback to cargo, as of now we're integrating examples with TinyGo and AssemblyScript and we aren't going to require a Rust toolchain with additional language support

brooksmtownsend commented 2 years ago

https://packagecloud.io/docs#push_pkg will likely be useful for this, we just need to add in the additional OS numbers into the release_amd64 action matrix

gmlewis commented 2 years ago

Same situation for Linux Mint Cinnamon 20.3, by the way.

$ cat /etc/os-release
NAME="Linux Mint"
VERSION="20.3 (Una)"
ID=linuxmint
ID_LIKE=ubuntu
PRETTY_NAME="Linux Mint 20.3"
VERSION_ID="20.3"
HOME_URL="https://www.linuxmint.com/"
SUPPORT_URL="https://forums.linuxmint.com/"
BUG_REPORT_URL="http://linuxmint-troubleshooting-guide.readthedocs.io/en/latest/"
PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://www.linuxmint.com/"
VERSION_CODENAME=una
UBUNTU_CODENAME=focal
brooksmtownsend commented 2 years ago

@gmlewis Thanks for bringing this to our attention too... we've got some planned improvements to the wash install process that hopefully will remove our need to update packagecloud for each distribution.

For now, to install wash, a fallback you can always do is use a Rust installation and cargo to cargo install wash-cli

edit: Thank you for your patience!