Hey, this is pretty funny. Look at how it detects obviously joyful statements as sad. You can easily see what's happening here.
Here's the text I sent in:
I haven't met or known Steve Wozniak, but as a programmer, I'll try to debug this question for you from logical deduction! The man is an engineer known for co-founding Apple computers. Apple valued simplicity, user-friendlyness, and aesthetics as well as functionality.
JavaScript, in terms of tradional computer programming theory, is the fundamental thesis, the minimalistic epitome.
It is not only dynamically typed, but scripted, which is for ease of development (and distribution.)
It is evented, as it was made for user-interface, yet subsequently works well for server/client communication; Ajax (client), Json (communication), Node.js (server).
It is single-threaded, which, combined with eventing as a methodology, is as simple as can be, yet powerful and beautiful. There is only one queue of instructions to execute one-at-a-time, but that allows guaranteed state management without complexity.
With closure and prototype, scope and methods are consolidated into the same mechanism; functions, while datatypes and classes are consolidated into the same concept; objects.
JavaScript is a proof-of-concept for simplicity, user-friendliness, and functionality. With computer science, applied mathematics theory, a lot of these principles fundamentally overlap and converge. Even though JavaScript was created in 11 days to just be a basic runtime, it goes to show that with programming, in theory, the simplest answer can be the best one.
If this were a multiple-choice test, I'd go with "a":
a.) would be fortunate to enjoy an appreciation of JavaScript
b.) would find it's quirks and nuances too wasteful
c.) would find prototypical inheritance too lacking
d.) would find it a practical failure altogether
Ty4 A2A
Here's what it detected as sadness:
I haven't met or known Steve Wozniak, but as a programmer, I'll try to debug this question for you from logical deduction!
There is only one queue of instructions to execute one-at-a-time, but that allows guaranteed state management without complexity.
Hey, this is pretty funny. Look at how it detects obviously joyful statements as sad. You can easily see what's happening here.
Here's the text I sent in:
I haven't met or known Steve Wozniak, but as a programmer, I'll try to debug this question for you from logical deduction! The man is an engineer known for co-founding Apple computers. Apple valued simplicity, user-friendlyness, and aesthetics as well as functionality.
JavaScript, in terms of tradional computer programming theory, is the fundamental thesis, the minimalistic epitome.
JavaScript is a proof-of-concept for simplicity, user-friendliness, and functionality. With computer science, applied mathematics theory, a lot of these principles fundamentally overlap and converge. Even though JavaScript was created in 11 days to just be a basic runtime, it goes to show that with programming, in theory, the simplest answer can be the best one.
If this were a multiple-choice test, I'd go with "a":
Ty4 A2A
Here's what it detected as sadness:
I haven't met or known Steve Wozniak, but as a programmer, I'll try to debug this question for you from logical deduction!
There is only one queue of instructions to execute one-at-a-time, but that allows guaranteed state management without complexity.