Closed fearphage closed 4 years ago
Hi @fearphage! I'm not sure that I saw the review comments in question.
But, in particular, you should be looking for GITHUB_ACTIONS
, not GITHUB_ACTION
. GITHUB_ACTION
is set if and only if you are an action. (Terminology: an action is a modular, reusable component that can be run by many people's workflows, while a workflow is something that you set up in your repository to perform work like a build, deploy or some piece of repository automation.) So a typical workflow run would not have GITHUB_ACTION
set.
GITHUB_ACTIONS
is set, always, for workflows. It tells you that you're running in the context of GitHub Actions.
So we should be looking for GITHUB_ACTIONS
here, not GITHUB_ACTION
. The plural variable is always set, the former variable will not be set in peoples workflow runs.
GITHUB_ACTIONS
is set, always, for workflows. It tells you that you're running in the context of GitHub Actions.
As I asked in the previous PR, can you please link me to something confirming this? I cannot find GITHUB_ACTIONS
(plural) in any documentation.
@fearphage did you check your code via github actions and saw that it's missing? can you show a log/screenshot of that? if the answer is no, is there a good reason to ignore @ethomson explanation? i have to admit, i fail to understand why to create a new PR in the first place. you stated the PR is dormant, but to me it looks like the repo is dormant and a new PR doesn't help.
As I asked in the previous PR, can you please link me to something confirming this? I cannot find GITHUB_ACTIONS (plural) in any documentation.
Right, sorry. We’re a bit behind with a few documentation updates. We should have this soon, apologies.
i have to admit, i fail to understand why to create a new PR in the first place. you stated the PR is dormant, but to me it looks like the repo is dormant and a new PR doesn't help.
I didn't realize the repo wasn't been maintained. The PR had unresolved comments from 28 days ago so it looked abandoned. My goal is the functionality.
We’re a bit behind with a few documentation updates.
Understood. I'm more than happy to stick with your PR.
My goal is the functionality.
Agreed! I don't think anybody thought otherwise, I appreciate the PR. 😀
This is built on the excellent work by @ethomson in #42. It just seems to have gone dormant for about a month so I wanted to add the few review comments to get it over the line. I couldn't figure out how to push to the branch for that PR.
I centered the detection around the following environment variables:
GITHUB_ACTION
GITHUB_EVENT_NAME
GITHUB_EVENT_PATH
This fixes #31.