Closed glebm closed 6 years ago
Sorry for the slow response.
Overall, this looks great!
Would it make more sense for Expr
to remain the name of the exported type, and have some other name for the internal type?
Would it make more sense for Expr to remain the name of the exported type, and have some other name for the internal type?
Sure, any thoughts on a good name? RuntimeExpr
?
Yeah, RuntimeExpr
sounds good. It also fits with the naming of ParserConfig
and RuntimeParserConfig
.
@orlandohill Done!
Great, thanks! :)
Should I be doing normal merge commits, rather than squashing, by default? I assume it's better to preserve the commit history, and maybe it's easier at your end too.
I generally prefer to squash, these intermediate commits are not very important and it keeps the master branch history clean.
Thanks, that's good to know. I'll do that by default.
Also renames
ANY
toANY_CHAR
for clarity.@jishi9 @ddrone Please review!