Open jamesheatonrdm opened 3 months ago
Their dataset paper indicates the LiDAR specification:
And here is through my visualization (different color means different LiDARs I also show other four LiDARs):
Also curious about the question the channel-type LiDAR of the other four.
Link a relate issue on channel-type LiDAR: https://github.com/waymo-research/waymo-open-dataset/issues/334
I am trying to find out the number of layers in the LiDARs other than TOP i.e. FRONT, REAR, SIDE_LEFT, SIDE_RIGHT.
Decompressing the range image, it appears that the number of layers is 200, which doesn't seem to make sense.
When I decompress the top LiDAR range image, the dimensions are as follows:
(64, 2560, 4)
Which makes sense as it is a 64-layer LiDAR.
However, for all the other LiDARs, I get the following dimensions:
(200, 600, 4)
Which implies that the number of layers in these LiDARs is 200. This doesn't make sense as I am not sure if there even exists a LiDAR with 200 layers.
I am decompressing the range image with the following:
Furthermore, when I use the util function
convert_frame_to_dict
, I get 64 beam inclinations for the top LiDAR, and again 200 beam inclinations for the other LiDARS. However this function uses the height of the range image to obtain the beam inclinations, which is obtained by using the same code as shown above.Viewing the contents of
frame.context
the beam inclinations for the top lidar are given, and there are 64 of them which makes sense. However the beam inclinations for the other LiDARs are not given, only the minimum and maximum. Why is this the case?Would someone be able to confirm / deny whether 200 is indeed the correct number of layers for the other LiDARs, and if not, where can I find the correct information?
Thanks in advance.