Closed loreucci closed 7 years ago
Can reproduce, thanks for your report! Will start working on a fix.
Hey @loreucci - you're welcome and thank you :)
@Thor77 has worked on a fix and I've just published v4.6.1. Would you mind giving it a go?
Just tried it and now everything is working as expected.
Thank you and keep up the good work!
First of all, thank you for creating wunderline, I just installed it and it already improved my wunderlist experience!
However, I encountered some issues when I tried to add tasks with many subtask. Aside from the fact that the subtasks appeared in a completely different order from the one in the command, I noticed that sometimes not all subtasks were added. Then I tried to redo the same command and everytime the results were different (different order, different tasks missing). Moreover, the more the subtasks, the more was the chance that someone was missing.
For example, running this command:
$ wunderline add 't' --subtask '1' --subtask '2' --subtask '3' --subtask '4' --subtask '5' --subtask '6' --subtask '7' --subtask '8' --subtask '9' --subtask '10'
led to these subtask lists: 9 6 7 5 10 10 5 7 8 4 3 6 9 2 3 6 9 5 2 7 9 10
By running the command with
NODE_DEBUG=request
it seems like all the requests are sent, so maybe this is a server-side issue:Can you reproduce this? I'm running wunderline 4.6.0 on node v7.7.3 on Arch Linux, if this helps.