Closed sbates130272 closed 5 years ago
Perhaps modelled on something that already exists in the kernel like:
Also thought about this, but its probably a long road to go and I'm not so sure if whitening has its place in a kernel driver.
Anyway, the Infinite Noise TRNG driver can feed the kernels entropy pool so other "parts" can access its entropy. Or is there a downside of the current approach I'm not aware of?
I think we should stick to the libinfnoise idea (#51) for integration in custom applications and infnoise for use with shell scripts or /dev/random mode. (for now)
Based on the lib it will be a lot easier to implement a kernel driver.
Hi
Yes I agree we can just take the entropy pool approach to feed the TRNG entropy into the kernel. I'd be happy to close this now as I don't think we even need it as an enhancement.
Stephen
Great project! Has anyone looked at an in-kernel version of infnoise to provide TRNG services to other parts of the kernel? It could also expose the infnoise devices in the device tree to make consumption by user-space easier?