Closed johnburnett closed 9 years ago
I have no objections, and I wouldn't mind a patch to that effect. -A
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 2:03 PM, John Burnett notifications@github.com wrote:
In SeExprFunc::loadPlugins, if the path being looked at is a directory, and no plugins are found, an error is printed to stderr (line SeExprFunc.cpp:235-238). This feels at odds with "most apps" where they can be pointed to a plugin path that may or may not exist, and have that be treated as a no-op if it doesn't. Would there be any objections to commenting/deleting this bit of printing code?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/wdas/SeExpr/issues/26.
*just pinging in case you weren't notified of the pull request (I converted this issue into an actual pull request, and I'm not sure how github deals with that).
In SeExprFunc::loadPlugins, if the path being looked at is a directory, and no plugins are found, an error is printed to stderr (line SeExprFunc.cpp:235-238). This feels at odds with "most apps" where they can be pointed to a plugin path that may or may not exist, and have that be treated as a no-op if it doesn't. Would there be any objections to commenting/deleting this bit of printing code?