Closed gsingh93 closed 8 years ago
Also, we're changing terms to the 4th every three months, starting in January 2016. @gsingh93
Document looks good on the whole. Nice job! I've added some line comments on the commit.
@iangcarroll I agree with most of your comments, but I don't think having an exact time frame is required. Something like that can lead to people not having the time to leave comments or thoroughly read the changes. If admin's do a bad job handling PRs, that will come up during the elections. (Note the reason we have elections in the first place is so we don't have to strictly define all of these things, as the better admins will do all of these things without it being strictly specified in the policy).
I have some more questions about banning:
Not sure about the list. We could keep a private list that any admin could see (maybe a private github repo). That would help address the next two points.
I think unbanning across administrations is fine. Again, we trust our admins to some extent, as we elected them. With a list of who was banned and why (as you suggested), they should be allowed to make this decision. However, if they unban, this should count as the user's "second chance", and fucking up again probably should not result in another unban later on.
I think bans should be permanent after a second chance.
Let's set a date to close comments and another date to merge along with any fixes per the given comments.
Maybe I should also add that purposefully deactivating your account while you're an admin is grounds for removal as an admin.
@gsingh93 probably a good idea, as it could lead to a single admin, or an admin-less group
Just updated the document. I'm fairly happy with it, please let me know if you have any other concerns. cc: @frankcash and @arirawr who haven't made any comments here yet.
:+1:
We should document what happens if an admin resigns or leaves.
Updated.
(rendered)