search

wearehx / policies

6 stars 5 forks source link

Organize admin election section & add removal section. #6

Closed iangcarroll closed 8 years ago

gsingh93 commented 8 years ago

This PR looks good, but it looks like I missed this part in the last PR: "This number must be above zero and less than ten."

I'm not sure we want to set a limit on the number of admins. It may be the case we have enough posts to warrant that many admins.

iangcarroll commented 8 years ago

Seems fair; the goal was to prevent the current admin team from setting an extremely large number of admins to be elected so that they would have a very good chance at being elected (i.e setting it to 100 admins next election). Is this a problem we should still address?

iangcarroll commented 8 years ago

The nomination idea is just an idea; comments on that? The ballot page will be showing metadata/text from each candidate so I want to make sure the page isn't extremely long.

gsingh93 commented 8 years ago

If we've elected admins that are going to do shit like that (raise the number of admins to 100), the problem isn't the policy, it's the admins. If we didn't have a clause to raise the number of admins, there are probably 100 loopholes a bad admin could exploit. I think you should just remove this upper bound.

I was initially against nomination, but now that you mention the long page, I think it might be a good idea. We can leave it in and see what others think.

gsingh93 commented 8 years ago

@letsgitit, we'll be releasing the draft later today, feel free to copy your comments onto that version.

@iangcarroll, can you make the fix I mentioned and then merge?

letsgitit commented 8 years ago

So I have experience with laws, codes of conducts, Roberts rule of order; but I am so lost when it comes to git hub. Where exactly am I to deposit my two sense? And If I want to add things not discussed (ie definitions, case studies, a particularly by law) where do I do that!

letsgitit commented 8 years ago

*cents

gsingh93 commented 8 years ago

Hey @letsgitit, this specific document is still being edited by @iangcarroll and myself. When I publish the PR in a few hours, I will post a link here tagging you, so you know where to go to put your comments.

gsingh93 commented 8 years ago

@letsgitit, see #10. You can discuss your thoughts there.

letsgitit commented 8 years ago

"After the initial discussion in one of the above locations, a PR can be made on this repo, either adding a document or modifying a document. The PR text should contain a detailed, well-thought out description of all of the changes and why they are being made. A post should be made in HX Meta about the PR." got it

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:52 PM, Gulshan Singh notifications@github.com wrote:

@letsgitit https://github.com/letsgitit, see #10 https://github.com/wearehx/policies/pull/10. You can discuss your thoughts there.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/wearehx/policies/pull/6#issuecomment-165004576.

847-873-4688 "When a true genius appears in this world, you will know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in a confederacy against him."-J. Swift