Closed janelx closed 5 months ago
Prioritized for Sprint 3.3.
This will be included in #248 based on MVP WFO recommendation from #165:
@colinmurphy01 I think we might need an additional user story as this one doesn't really match the attribution one. BUT updated weather story covers attribution. Here is what I was thinking the value of showing this on the page, if we don't have something from the from trust and authority exercise
Value:
Closing this as it's being stubbed in Greg's work implementing the point location page #248.
The refinements noted above will be considered in #461
Re-opening this ticket. We have a placeholder in beta, however this hasn't been designed or implemented into the CMS.
Updated to reflect latest recommendations based on content models and user feedback. I believe next steps are:
Should this be added to today's co-work agenda, or wait till Igor's back?
It's pretty basic so we could maybe chat about it briefly during cowork and then he could look at it when he's back? It does still need his alignment, but I don't expect any surprises with this one.
@colinmurphy01 So for this one since we have alignment does it go straight to eng with a build ticket? And am I right you don't want to repurpose this ticket for the build, but I should make a new one with all this info in it but tagged for eng? Sorry, still getting a feel for the ticket progression.
Yes please do that to just get in the habit of closing tickets and opening eng tickets as the last step.
Since it's EOD, you can do that Monday AM.
Opened #597 for next steps, moving this one to done
Goal
Provide a quick introduction to the WFO responsible for the forecast, with a quick path to contact the office or learn more about it.
Supported user stories
1.1 - I want to know how NWS serves my priorities 1.2 - I want to know who creates forecasts and hazards, and how they create them 6.1 - As a partner, I want to know who and how I can reach out to someone when I need to
Dependencies
CMS needs the ability to map a geographic location to a specific WFO based on coverage area
Content
All content is authored in the CMS
WFO Name is an H2 Intro text is plain text only, no styling elements needed
Behavior
Example in document here
Acceptance criteria
Site users should be able to:
Content creators should be able to:
Content admins should be able to:
Review: design, function and flow: