Closed steve-fraser closed 2 years ago
thanks for opening the issue @steve-fraser . So the problem is that the thing your deploying then creates resources itself, in a different namespace. I'm not actually sure what the problem is :thinking: ? Or rather what would you want profiles to do differently :smile: ? Thanks!
@aclevername a standard installation normally keeps everything in istio-system
. I think that would be the thought to be able to keep everything in that namespace separately from the rest of the installation
@aclevername a standard installation normally keeps everything in
istio-system
. I think that would be the thought to be able to keep everything in that namespace separately from the rest of the installation
I'm still slightly confused though, what would you want pctl to do differently? Its correctly deploying the istio operator, what that operator then goes onto install is out of our control? Sorry if I'm missing something obvious :smile:
This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days.
This issue was closed because it has been stalled for 5 days with no activity.
I am installing Istio using
pctl add
where I am installing the Istio Operator and a Gateway service.The Istio Operator gets installed into the user-defined namespace space, but the Istio Operator installs all of the required objects, egress and ingress Gateways in the
istio-system
namespace.These manifests create an interesting installation breakup that is non-standard.