Closed marcoscaceres closed 1 year ago
Is this covered by #127?
Is this covered by #127?
After both that and https://github.com/w3c/webdriver/pull/1695 are landed, yes. But I think we can keep this as its own RFC to not depend on any of that.
Per https://github.com/web-platform-tests/rfcs#the-rfc-process we can merge this if there's no further feedback in 1 week.
I don't think it makes sense to land this without the WebDriver PR landing. Without that PR, the details of this API are underspecified and it doesn't meet our bar for inclusion.
That's ok @jgraham (and maybe we can get that landed also within a week? 🙏).
As we have multiple implementers interested, who do we need to bug over on the Web Driver side to get things moving?
This RFC is good to go now that the PR is merged right? @jgraham @foolip
Per policy we no longer require an RFC for testdriver additions that correspond directly to WebDriver endpoints. So we can either merge this or not, but in any case it doesn't block adding the feature.
See details in the proposed .md.
tl;dr: this is a proposal to add...