gsnedders
commented
5 years ago Should the code itself be included in this RFC?
Probably yes.
One detail that needs to be decided is if the WPT Core Team is to be the same as the group of enforcers.
I think both myself and @jgraham, per discussion on IRC earlier, strongly feel that it must not be. Otherwise if the question is about the conduct of the Core Team (in whole or in part) is in question, then the same group are trying to resolve it.
As I said earlier, I'd quite strongly prefer to have a more diverse set of individuals than the Core Team (really I'd rather that be more diverse too!), given plenty of conflict can be down to mistreatment of minority groups, and it helps to have people they feel will understand their concerns (and the almost entirely cis white men of the Core Team aren't that). That said, to do this will likely involve reaching out to people in browser communities that aren't so involved with standards or this project upstream (both of which are notably less diverse than the browser communities as a whole).
foolip
jugglinmike
boazsender
thejohnjansen
jgraham
stephenmcgruer
In WPT issue gh-7520, @plehegar made an initial attemp to introduce a code of conduct based on the Rust language's policy. That seems like a good place to start from since it was only blocked on the existence of a group like the WPT Core Team. Should the code itself be included in this RFC?
One detail that needs to be decided is if the WPT Core Team is to be the same as the group of enforcers. Whatever the case, we should have some public commitment from each person who is listed in that document.
Here's the rendered version.