Open nicolasbrugneaux opened 2 hours ago
I'm happy to propose changes but I just wanted to get your opinion on what you think should happen, I believe the function is somewhat redudant and could be limited to field aliasing (data<->input, gas<->gasLimit)
Greetings! Thanks again for merging my work in
7227
Sadly, it's still not enough to allow for extra fields in transactions. Indeed, this function
getEthereumjsTxDataFromTransaction
is trimming down fields despite being validated earlier