Closed kaczmarj closed 2 years ago
@kaczmarj Is this issue in any way related to PR #329? If not, I'll merge this into development.
nope, this is not related to #329. but i was thinking of waiting until #328 is merged so we can test that this PR fixes the jsdoc error in mergeExpression
.
jsdoc has passed! nice!!! this pr is ready for review.
jsdoc complained about the return type in this function. this commit resolves that problem. the fix is to use
Array.<TYPE>
instead ofTYPE[]
. i am confused, however, because sometimes usingTYPE[]
does work.this also replaces
(number | null)
with the more compact syntax?number
.let's wait on this PR until #328 is merged.
replaces #337