Open bennypowers opened 1 year ago
I think this is a good idea, especially if we see tools that combine manifests at all.
My big comment on #123 is that we need to figure out some namespacing system, since npm isn't the only package registry. There's GitHub packages, JSR, and private registries.
As a start, should we either require an npm:
prefix, or assume that plain names are npm packages?
cc @mannix-lei
It occurs me that the
Package
entity doesn't have a name field. This may present a problem if the user only has access to the custom-elements.json, but not the package.jsonfor example, when pre-loading manifests into a language server, a la https://github.com/Matsuuu/custom-elements-language-server/issues/20