Open stof opened 4 years ago
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
@bicknellr any answer to this licensing confusion ?
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
This confusion still exists. /cc @bicknellr
the package.json reports the license as
SAX-PD
: https://github.com/webcomponents/polyfills/blob/d152fd4b436f51c708845b04b9826123ce6d93f3/packages/url/package.json#L12 The source code reports the license asCC0
: https://github.com/webcomponents/polyfills/blob/d152fd4b436f51c708845b04b9826123ce6d93f3/packages/url/url.js#L1-L2While both are public domain licenses, it would be great to avoid the confusion by using the same license in both places.