Wording: Use shorter possessive form for abstract object properties

inexorabletash commented 9 months ago

As discussed in https://github.com/webmachinelearning/webnn/pull/555#discussion_r1483911739

Old and busted: ... the [=property=] of |object| ...
New hotness: ... |object|'s [=property=] ...

While making this change (which was mostly automated) I noticed a handful of very intertwined glitches; I included fixes as separate commits in this PR, to avoid too many PRs. They are:

Correct a few cases of "rank of op's shape" to just "rank of op" (shapes have a size, operands have a rank)
Fix some duplicated words
Referencing descriptor properties, but directly against an operand.
A few case where the simplification in 8503e2487126803a66cd870192657093dc16cb48 was missed.

I can split them out if desired.

Preview | Diff

anssiko commented 9 months ago

@inexorabletash much thanks! Ready to merge when the conflicts have been resolved.

inexorabletash commented 9 months ago

Resolved - @anssiko please double check and merge at your leisure!

anssiko commented 9 months ago

Still looks as good as earlier and the build is 🟢 so... let's squash and merge!

webmachinelearning / webnn

Wording: Use shorter possessive form for abstract object properties #565