Closed steko closed 2 years ago
Thanks for noticing this inconsistency. @ikreymer recently decided he wants the v1.2.0 spec to accurately describe existing WACZ that is out there. There is a lot more of it because of the recent work on SUCHO. Using the profile field differently was going to be part of an incremental improvement that we will save for a potential future version of WACZ. So we will be going with the former data-package
for now.
Hello and thanks for creating this spec!
I think there is a small inconsistency in the section about
datapackage.json
.In the first paragraph it reads:
(this is what py-wacz does: https://github.com/webrecorder/py-wacz/blob/fbd3657281c30aaac0cc14cedb6c7f0692d07a24/wacz/waczindexer.py#L334 )
But a few paragraphs below it gives a different indication: