search

webrtcftw / iswebrtcreadyyet.com

Promoting WebRTC support through the clever use of a website with words on it
http://iswebrtcreadyyet.com/
53 stars 21 forks source link

add vp9 support #42

Closed fippo closed 9 years ago

fippo commented 9 years ago

showing the highly experimental VP9 support

stefanalund commented 9 years ago

I would argue that codecs that are not part of the WebRTC standards spec, such as VP9 and H.265, should not be on this list.

fippo commented 9 years ago

Well, you probably shouldn't get a "red == bad" thing for this. But I want to add things like G.722 as well, which isn't MTI either

stefanalund commented 9 years ago

Still, I think it's important to distinguish between a standard and its implementations. There is already too much confusion around that in the WebRTC space.

fippo commented 9 years ago

reverted -- I think this needs more discussion -- tomorrow most likely

bear commented 9 years ago

@fippo I'll leave the branch around for reference until after the discussion

sockdrawermoney commented 9 years ago

I think it's perfectly reasonable to have an "edge" portion of the graph content that's for non-MTI codecs, but to make it clear that these are not the present standard.

This information is likely interesting to at least a subset of people who use this site as a reference.