Also, it would be handy to have the ability to specify the synthetic predicate 'any predicate', and the synthetic concept 'any concept' (which would subsume the X above).
It would be useful to be able to specify the types of an underspecified concept: gene product, disease, phenotype, etc. We could support SemMedDB semantic types, but we probably should also support synthetic concept types, since the SemMedDB types are rather messy.
We should support sorting and filtering of answers.
Right now the Racket GUI supports:
Concept 1 -> Predicate 1 -> X -> Predicate 2 -> Concept 2and
Concept 1 -> Predicate -> Xand
X -> Predicate -> Concept 2where
Xis some unspecified concept.However, the existing interface does not support the direct connection between two specified concepts and a specified predicate:
Concept 1 -> Predicate -> Concept 2It would also be useful to be able to specify the middle concept in the two predicate query above:
Concept 1 -> Predicate 1 -> Concept 3 -> Predicate 2 -> Concept 2Also, it would be handy to have the ability to specify the synthetic predicate 'any predicate', and the synthetic concept 'any concept' (which would subsume the
Xabove).It would be useful to be able to specify the types of an underspecified concept: gene product, disease, phenotype, etc. We could support SemMedDB semantic types, but we probably should also support synthetic concept types, since the SemMedDB types are rather messy.
We should support sorting and filtering of answers.