Open jeffhhk opened 3 years ago
Benchmark exercise:
(cd medikanren && racket) (require xrepl) (require "db.rkt") (require "common.rkt") (load-databases #t) (time (enter! "../contrib/medikanren/use-cases/PMI-20-10-Il1R1-case-reviews.rkt")) ; this is the time measurement shown
Database list:
covid19 orange pr-owl robokop rtx semmed sri_semmeddb textminingprovider sri-reference-kg-0.2.0 rtx2_2020_09_16 co-occur umlsmeta
Configurations:
1) 5GB cui cache (2m11s startup time) (in-memory-names? . #f) (in-memory-cuis? . #t) (num-cached-cuis . #f) cpu time: 60928 real time: 61051 gc time: 3053 2) 1MB cui cache (32s startup time) (in-memory-names? . #f) (in-memory-cuis? . #f) (num-cached-cuis . 3000) cpu time: 75705 real time: 75830 gc time: 3516 3) No cui cache (32s startup time) (in-memory-names? . #f) (in-memory-cuis? . #f) (num-cached-cuis . #f) cpu time: 212676 real time: 213121 gc time: 4044
The current pull request is to merge with LRU caching with no change to default behavior. That is, config.defaults.scm is configuration 1).
After merging, I propose another team member use configuration similar to 2) for a few days, and if successful, make it default.
Note that this PR includes #59 because #59 fixes the benchmark exercise above.
Looks like Thi's changes were included here by mistake.
Benchmark exercise:
Database list:
Configurations:
The current pull request is to merge with LRU caching with no change to default behavior. That is, config.defaults.scm is configuration 1).
After merging, I propose another team member use configuration similar to 2) for a few days, and if successful, make it default.
Note that this PR includes #59 because #59 fixes the benchmark exercise above.