Package names

[lucifer1004]

Due to my fault, I published a package named wechaty_puppet before, so we could not publish wechaty-puppet due to crates.io's constraints.

I'd like to hear your opinions on the package names.

Plan A: Use snake case

• filebox
• wechaty
• wechaty_puppet
• wechaty_puppet_mock
• wechaty_puppet_service

A shortcoming here is that I named the auto generated grpc package wechaty-grpc, so wechaty_grpc is not allowed. We will have to consider an alternative name for the grpc package, if we want to keep a uniform naming convention.

Plan B: Use kebal case

• filebox
• wechaty
• wechaty-puppet-container / wechaty-puppet-wrapper / wechaty-puppet-abstract (or even maybe simply puppet, since it is not taken yet)
• wechaty-puppet-mock
• wechaty-puppet-service
• wechaty-grpc

[lucifer1004]

This is a prerequisite for #10 since the getting-started would need published packages.

[huan]

I'd like to suggest that we use kebal case (plan b) to be consistent with Node NPM package names if possible.

And my another two cents:

1. the FileBox module name in NPM is file-box,
2. I think we can use the name wechaty_puppet as well because it will be an internal dependencies.

[lucifer1004]

Closed via #14