Closed ethanwhite closed 10 years ago
@embaldridge are you seeing this as well?
Yup. It seems to have popped up all of a sudden.
[evaluate sad-comparisons.py]
bbs, Site 4002, S=35, N=816
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/wingide-101-4.1/src/debug/tserver/_sandbox.py", line 146, in
@rueuntal would you mind taking a peak at this is you have a few minutes?
Does it not work for all sites or specific sites?
@embaldridge and @ethanwhite , could either of you post or send me an abundance list where it doesn't work?
Coming your way, @rueuntal.
I ran
mu, sigma = md.pln_solver(ab)
L_pln = md.pln_ll(ab, mu, sigma)
with the list of abundances @embaldridge sent and it worked fine on Zoe. Is that where the problem occurs for you folks?
I think so.
Hmmm that's a bit strange. @embaldridge are you running the code on one of the servers? Which one are you using?
I tried the little piece of test code on all three servers, and Wash flagged the same error as above while the other two were fine. So I'm guessing that it's likely the result of version differences in some of the modules called by macroeco_distributions (most probably scipy).
I've been developing the code on the Laptop of Science. I'm running version 0.13.3 of scipy, if that helps.
I've removed all instances of "full_output" from the module and that seems to have fixed the problem. However I'm still not sure what was causing Scipy to fail in the first place.
All better, closing this issue.
When I run the current code I get the following error when it tries to fit the Poisson lognormal using Scipy 0.14.0 and the current master for macroecotools: