Closed MaestSi closed 1 year ago
Hi: I couldn't figure out exactly what was going on without actual data. In my opinion, anomalies are more data-level than software bugs.
Would you mind doing the following checks? 1.Inspecting the mapping results of BAM file, especially coverage of candidate sites. 2.Is the fasta file that the bam file depends on the same as the tombo resquiggle?
best wishes
Hi, I checked that the fasta file used for the alignment is the same used for tombo resquiggling, and the alignment seems ok. By the way, I was able to obtain results for 1 dataset out of 3 (from 3 different organisms) using the exact same code, only with different data and reference file. Best, Simone
Hi,
If one of the three biological replicates is processed normally, the output is as expected, and the other two are abnormal. My advice and guess is the dataset itself, if you can provide some information about the data (after data anonymization), maybe I can help.
best wishes
Dear developers, I'm running dena on a dataset, and I am not able to get any results. In particular, I noticed that this command:
python3 /DENA/step4_predict/LSTM_extract.py predict --fast5 FAST5_dir --corr_grp RawGenomeCorrected_000 --bam transcriptome.bam --sites candidate_predict_pos.txt --label "dena_label" --windows 2 2 --processes 1 --debug
is producing only *_tmp empty files. I noticed from the standard error that the tool is able to find reads in fast5 but not in bam file, e.g.:Do you know what may have caused the issue? Thanks in advance, Simone