CA data camera timestamp is missing , and I SEE THE PAPER AND CLOSED ISSUE,
SUGGEST USE LIDAR timestamp replcae the camera timestamp, BUT the number of the camera messages is not equal
to Lidar messsage number.
I really suspect it will be a good benchmark for localization with lossing timestamp , should i use 1/100HZ as delta t ,or not
equal lidar timestamp ?
I do not think it is good for Rigorous academic research
CA data camera timestamp is missing , and I SEE THE PAPER AND CLOSED ISSUE, SUGGEST USE LIDAR timestamp replcae the camera timestamp, BUT the number of the camera messages is not equal to Lidar messsage number. I really suspect it will be a good benchmark for localization with lossing timestamp , should i use 1/100HZ as delta t ,or not equal lidar timestamp ? I do not think it is good for Rigorous academic research