Closed silveroliver closed 6 years ago
Example:
{
"subjects": [
{
"label": "Tuberculosis - prevention & control -- Paris -- 1850 -- bibliography.",
"type": "Subject",
"concept": {
"id": "hd2891f",
"label": "Tuberculosis",
"type": "Concept",
"identifiers": [
{
"type": "Identifier",
"identifierScheme": "mesh",
"value": "D014376Q000517"
}
]
},
"places": [
{
"label": "Paris",
"type": "Place"
}
],
"periods": [
{
"label": "1850",
"type": "Period"
}
],
"topics": [
{
"label": "prevention & control",
"type": "Concept"
}
],
"genres": [
{
"label": "bibliography",
"type": "Form"
}
]
},
{
"label": "Paris.",
"type": "Subject",
"concept": {
"id": "hd2891f",
"label": "Paris",
"type": "Place",
"identifiers": [
{
"type": "Identifier",
"identifierScheme": "lcsh",
"value": "sh014376Q000517"
}
]
}
},
{
"label": "1820.",
"type": "Subject",
"concept": {
"id": "hd2891f",
"label": "1820",
"type": "Period"
}
}
]
}
Looking for alternatives to "topics".
This work is about Tuberculosis and...
"topics" : "prevention & control" or "generalDivisions": "prevention & control" or "generalQualifiers": "prevention & control" "generalConcept": "prevention & control" "generalSubjects": "prevention & control" "furtherQualifiers": "prevention & control" "qualifiers" : "prevention & control" "divisions" : "prevention & control" "descriptors" : "prevention & control" "generalQualifiers": "prevention & control"
The more I think about this, the more I'm coming round to calling concept
primaryConcept
and topics
secondaryConcepts
. In an attempt to describe both the relationship from Subject
and between the concept and general devisions.
I’ve been looking at mads/skos and how Oslo Public Library deal with 650. Oslo public library don’t catalogue anymore using marc records/use minimal marc records:
https://summit2017.lodlam.net/2017/04/12/oslo-public-library/
https://github.com/digibib/ls.ext/wiki/System-components-overview
Use of broader/narrower concepts looks popular… I am attempting to write some code using a narrower topic concept…
Mads example:
Oslo library example: http://data.deichman.no/subject/sjakk a skos:Concept ; (Main topical term: Chess) skos:narrower http://data.deichman.no/subject/x16878200 ; (Chess – Periodicals) skos:narrower http://data.deichman.no/subject/x12784600 ; (Chess – Endgame studies) skos:narrower http://data.deichman.no/subject/x12961800 ; (Chess – Problems) skos:narrower http://data.deichman.no/subject/x15398200 . (Chess – History)
Tania Williams Library Assistant Wellcome Library Wellcome Trust Gibbs Building 215 Euston Road London NW1 2BE, UK T +44 (0)20 7611 8500 F +44 (0)20 7611 8369 E t.williams@wellcome.ac.ukmailto:t.williams@wellcome.ac.uk http://wellcomelibrary.orghttp://wellcomelibrary.org/
From: Jonathan Tweed [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: 29 March 2018 17:42 To: wellcometrust/platform platform@noreply.github.com Cc: Tania Williams T.Williams@wellcome.ac.uk; Assign assign@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [wellcometrust/platform] Model for populating 650 - subjects (#1744)
The more I think about this, the more I'm coming round to calling concept primaryConcept and topics secondaryConcepts. In an attempt to describe both the relationship from Subject and between the concept and general devisions.
— You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/wellcometrust/platform/issues/1744#issuecomment-377296773, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AjPg3fg0TaQCh8wq4RhanFIeOmRmtdYJks5tjQ7BgaJpZM4S-mQr.
{
"subjects": [
{
"label": "Tuberculosis - prevention & control -- Paris -- 1850 -- bibliography.",
"type": "Subject",
"concept": {
"id": "hd2891f",
"label": "Tuberculosis",
"type": "Concept",
"identifiers": [
{
"type": "Identifier",
"identifierScheme": "mesh",
"value": "D014376Q000517"
}
]
},
"places": [
{
"label": "Paris",
"type": "Place"
}
],
"periods": [
{
"label": "1850",
"type": "Period"
}
],
"topics": [
{
"label": "prevention & control",
"type": "Concept"
}
],
"forms": [
{
"label": "bibliography",
"type": "Concept"
}
]
},
{
"label": "Paris.",
"type": "Subject",
"concept": {
"id": "hd2891f",
"label": "Paris",
"type": "Place",
"identifiers": [
{
"type": "Identifier",
"identifierScheme": "lcsh",
"value": "sh014376Q000517"
}
]
}
},
{
"label": "1820.",
"type": "Subject",
"concept": {
"id": "hd2891f",
"label": "1820",
"type": "Period"
}
}
]
}
Thought I'd carry on and throw this into the mix - I've made some new terminology suggestions often more than one for each term...
"subjects": [
Our use of subject was inpart inspired by Library of Congress. Though note ComplexSubject is not from Bibframe but is from another LC spec called MADS for representing authority records (acknowledging holes in SKOS in its ability to handle post-coordination).
http://www.loc.gov/standards/mads/rdf/v1.html#ComplexSubject