Closed Norvard closed 7 years ago
I'd prefer not to for now as it's really useful to differentiate.
Could we add a subtle change? Either colour of a dot or something?
What is the logic of having the stripes? It isn't very clear on tabs nor home screens as to what it is.
The rationale was that its what users of WC recognise today and its the most neutral mark (2 l shapes from WC logo) in terms of full brand architecture.
We can change the colour (yellow and teal?) but we should test keeping the 2 stripes
Could we have something different? At least for now, we can change it back when we usurp wc.org
(not serving from next.
). @jennpb Are you happy with this? I personally think sign posting that we're on a separate platform.
For home screens we can/should have an apple-touch-icon i.e. a big one and that could be the Wellcome Collection logo (e.g. https://trustnet.wellcome.ac.uk/sites/all/themes/int_base/touch-icon-192x192.png)
Yep agree. There we have an opportunity to use full WC logo since the space is bigger
Could be nice to use a WC monogram as the favicon, but this feels like a bathroom sign too much...
The 'W' itself is a no-go from brand team
@derivadow Yes, there's a few we need to take into account (we're going to be moving dow the PWA route, so need it for android etc too).
@Norvard If we get an SVG - we can run a task to create these for us.
@jamesgorrie @derivadow If we want a new favicon, we need to engage with the Brand & Comms team, and the head of marketing for WC. I don't think that's a good use of @Norvard's time right now.
The idea behind the two-colour block is that it represents the two ll in Wellcome; this pattern gets used on WC print marketing assets as well. That's why I felt that retaining the existing WC favicon is good enough for now.
Based on discussion with 8th floor, lets change/retain the favicon to the icon that WC currently use