wengxyu1030 / DHS-Recode-VI

The DHS Recode VI for HEFPI
0 stars 4 forks source link

SC Task 2022 - DHS-VI Turkey2013 #42

Open robin-wang opened 2 years ago

robin-wang commented 2 years ago

[CHECKLIST] WORKFLOW DOC Tracker for Project Management https://github.com/Data-Whale-DC/HEFPI2022-SC-update-tasks/issues/1

[WORKING BRANCH] https://github.com/wengxyu1030/DHS-Recode-VI/tree/DHSvi-Turkey2013-ZhuohangLi [RAW DATA] https://worldbankgroup-my.sharepoint.com/:f:/r/personal/sneelsen_worldbank_org/Documents/Projects/UHC/04%20STC/Aline/World%20Bank/MEASURE%20UHC%20DATA/RAW%20DATA/Recode%20VI?csf=1&web=1&e=djU9dZ

{FOR REVIEWERS}

{FOR CODERS} A. General Procedural Steps

B. Checklist and Guidance

robin-wang commented 2 years ago

Hi ! @Stellaaali Sorry for the mess-up again. Here is an updated task. DHS structure still applies. Instructions added at the start of the issue. @wengxyu1030 We added a task tracker to monitor progress, also at the start of this task assignment issue; hopefully this helps coordinate things across multiple waves. Cheers!

Stellaaali commented 2 years ago

Hi Robin! @robin-wang sorry for disturbing you in the night... i solved the stupid problems made in my do files, and they work successfully now! so i made a pull request here #44 .

i am not sure if i complete this requirement: "Check if there's a flag that the indicator value produced is too off from the published data" would you please explain me later if you dont mind?

Best Wishes!

robin-wang commented 2 years ago

Hi Robin! @robin-wang sorry for disturbing you in the night... i solved the stupid problems made in my do files, and they work successfully now! so i made a pull request here #44 .

i am not sure if i complete this requirement: "Check if there's a flag that the indicator value produced is too off from the published data" would you please explain me later if you dont mind?

Best Wishes!

Hi @Stellaaali Thanks for the pull request. I have left code related questions there. On the question you raised, we do have survey report for Turkey2013, just wonder if you have taken a look at the values in the report against our edited indicators?

robin-wang commented 2 years ago

Also just saw your question re m57e/s407ba, that's a great catch. I tabbed these two variables respectively against m13, the timing of antenatal care.

It seems the m57 series has the same universe as m13, whereas s407ba has a larger denominator base, meaning it counted those without reporting timing of antenatal care into its "no" group.

That said, your question was specifically asked about skilled antenatal care provided to pregnant women. In 1_antenatal_care.do, we used m2a-m2m series, and this series focuses on the types of professionals, whereas the m57/s407b series focus on the type of facilities. Let's stick with m2a-m2m.

Does this help?

robin-wang commented 2 years ago

Also, I see why you were confused earlier this afternoon, the benchmarking quality-checking step we undertake at the end of our exercise depends on the survey summary report. For Turkey2013, I don't see it in the data folder, which might have caused the confusion to you.

I am attaching it here for your reference. FR352.pdf