Issue Template for Streamlined Survey Update

[wengxyu1030]

WORKFLOW DOC

{FOR REVIEWERS}

• [ ] They can run the code smoothly on the reviewer's end, where the microdata could be generated without error
• [ ] Review and validate the quality checking output

{FOR CODERS} A. General Procedural Steps

• [ ] Rebase current branch based on Master, ensure your branch is the latest. Tutorial: Rebasing your project branch onto another branch https://docs.github.com/en/desktop/contributing-and-collaborating-using-github-desktop/syncing-your-branch#rebasing-your-project-branch-onto-another-branch

• [ ] Run script without error

• [ ] Pass internal quality checking (the embedded quality check result: successfully produced value for the indicators and check if there're flags that the indicator value produced is too off from the published data)

• [ ] Document as comments any notable changes/caveats (if any)

• [ ] When Fully Completed Survey Edits, proceed to record hours worked: https://forms.gle/tLh7fxCMMsLobGHA6

B. Checklist and Guidance

• [ ] ANC

  • Skill providers
  • Checked in the regular express section in Programs
  • Tetanus Injection
  • Number of Injection Before/During Pregnancy
  • Recall period for last injection
  • Relevant data comes other sections
  • Blood Pressure / Blood Sample / Urine Sample
  • Samples (m42c/d/e) are sub-questions for "receive antenatal care" in questionnaire or not

• [ ] Delivery Care

  • c_facdel / delivery institutions / c_hospdel / delivery institutions
  • Consistent with the regular expression section in Programs
  • c_skin2skin
  • Check if available; if, then note which variable
  • m15 skip condition
  • Usually delivery location is a filter question for c_caesarean(m17) / stay(m61) / mother or child PNC; is it m15, if not which one, and list the conditions used for m15 if pattern is peculiar (normally (m15 = 11, 12 etc))

• [ ] PNC

  • child pnc
  • See if child pnc is only avaliable when (m15=11,12,96) or (m15!=11,12,96)
  • Check if Child PNC is designed to be from full sample, i.e not a subquestion within fertility section. If a subquestion, don't generate c_pnc_any and c_pnc_eff

• [ ] Child Vaccination (search receive/month in birth.dta. if unknown vaccine pops up, search definition in DHS report)

  • BCG
  • DTP/DPT, DTaP, DTwP or pentavalent 1-3 against diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis
  • Polio 1-3 (IPV, OPV)
  • Measles/MMR
  • Other vaccines, if any,

• [ ] Child Illness

  • 20210510 For Providers, focus on the skilled providers rather than all
  • Diarrhea treatment provider
  • Check provider list being consistent with existing list (if not make changes in program)
  • Fever/Ari1/Ari2 treatment provider
  • Provider list being consistent with existing list
  • Fever/Fever Treatment/Cough/Cough Treatment from Full Sample
  • c_diarrhea_med, medicine and formal meds to treat are survey-specific. 20210510 focus on special medicines
  • c_diarrhea_medfor, medicine and formal meds to treat are survey-specific. 20210510 focus on special medicines
  • Validate c_ari can be generated or not

• [ ] Child Mortality

  • General Observations

• [ ] Sleeping Under Bednet

  • Adhere to program's logic, but please list any specific bednet related observations (tricky cases for presumed treated or the like)

• [ ] Child Anthropometrics

  • General Observations (No need to generate "Wasting")

• [ ] Reproductive Health

  • Contraceptive, check modern methods
  • In Need - most updated version of logics in program (temporarily no actions needed)

• [ ] Female Anthropometrics and Cancer Screening

  • Mammogram (X-ray, mamm...)
  • Pap Smear (Cervical vaginal cytology)
  • Note recall indicators for Mamm or Pap Smear (for example, s1012n used as filter for s1012m)

• [ ] Hospitalisation, NCD & HIV

  • Hospitalisation, general observations

  • Hypertension treatment , blood pressure measure in the past or during the survey, for example check hm.dta/ind.dta/men.dta (generate a_bp_treat a_bp_sys a_bp_dial a_bp_meas a_hi_bp140 a_hi_bp140_or_on_med from ind.dta & men.dta by combining them)

  • Note from WB team for reference: "don't worry if you cannot find men.dta, not all surveys have it. if it is collected from ind.dta and men.dta seperately (some survey have female & male questionnarie, collecting these data seperately), you will need to combine these 2 dataset, generating these indicators and merge them back to hm.dta. If only from ind.dta or men.dta, i.e. only for female or male, don't generate these variables. If a new/survey-specific datafile occurs, it is highly likely that it contains info. for 13.do. "

  • Diabetes treatment/measure in the past (for example, a_diab_treat)

  • HIV, general observations

  • HIV questionnaire might exsit in Section 4 of "HEALTH ISSUES QUESTIONNAIRE". If they don't ask hiv test results, they are not helpful. but please document these observations.

• [ ] Cross-validate statistics in survey report, if applicable.

• [ ] Reference the NAME-SURVEY branch when your edits are finalised.

  • Refer to the github working branch created for [Name-SurveyName]

• [ ] Update micro data in Onedrive

• [ ] Examine Quality Checking Output Files

  • [ ] Successfully produced the indicators
  • [ ] Check if there's a flag that the indicator value produced is too off from the published data

[wengxyu1030]

Can we have a section where the coder should check the embedded quality check result: successfully produced the indicators and check if there's a flag that the indicator value produced is too off from the published data?

[wengxyu1030]

For Reviewer:

It would be great to have two bullet points to add in the checklist from the reviewer (instead of coder) end:

1. They can run the code smoothly on the reviewer's end, where the microdata could be generated without error.
2. Review and validate the quality checking output.

[wengxyu1030]

Should there be an action where the coder should mark the survey as completed in the progress tracking spreadsheet?

[wengxyu1030]

3 Please see Xian's comment here on suggestions on refining the template

https://github.com/wengxyu1030/DHS-Recode-VII/issues/3#issuecomment-835859182

[wengxyu1030]

The template is finalized and well used in the repositories.