Senegal2019

[wengxyu1030]

WORKFLOW DOC

A. General Procedural Steps

• [x] Run script without error
• [x] Pass other internal testing
• [ ] Document as comments any materials referenced (in addition to survey documentation)
• [x] Document as comments any notable changes/caveats (if any)
• [x] When Fully Completed Survey Edits, proceed to record hours worked: https://forms.gle/tLh7fxCMMsLobGHA6

B. Checklist and Guidance

• [x] ANC

  • Skill providers
  • Q429 Doctor, Midwife, Nurse/ICF
  • Tetanus Injection
  • Number of Injection Before/During Pregnancy: Q415
  • Recall period for last injection: last birth only
  • Relevant data comes other sections: no
  • Blood Pressure / Blood Sample / Urine Sample
  • Samples (m42c/d/e) are sub-questions for "receive antenatal care" in questionnaire or not: yes, Q413

• [x] Delivery Care

  • c_facdel / delivery institutions / c_hospdel / delivery institutions
  • Consistent with the regular expression section in Programs: List of m15 (Q430): respondents' home, other home, government hospital, government health center/maternity, government health post, government case de sant, government mobile clinic, government filed worker, other public sector, private hospital/clinic, other private sector, other
  • c_skin2skin
  • Check if available; if, then note which variable: yes, m77
  • m15 skip condition
  • Usually delivery location is a filter question for c_caesarean(m17) / stay(m61) / mother or child PNC; is it m15, if not which one, and list the conditions used for m15 if pattern is peculiar (normally (m15 = 11, 12 etc)): if m15 = 11,12 & 96, skip to Q434 skin-to-skin

• [x] PNC

  • child pnc
  • See if child pnc is only avaliable when (m15=11,12,96) or (m15!=11,12,96): no
  • Check if Child PNC is designed to be from full sample, i.e not a subquestion within fertility section. If a subquestion, don't generate c_pnc_any and c_pnc_eff. yes, full sample

• [x] Child Vaccination (search receive/month in birth.dta. if unknown vaccine pops up, search definition in DHS report)

  • BCG: h2
  • DTP/DPT, DTaP, DTwP or pentavalent 1-3 against diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis: h3, h5, h7
  • Polio 1-3 (IPV, OPV): h4, h6, h8
  • Measles/MMR: h9 measles 1, h9a measles2
  • Other vaccines, if any,

• [x] Child Illness

  • Diarrhea treatment provider
  • Check provider list being consistent with existing list (if not make changes in program): h12a-x: government hospital, cs public health center, cs public health post, cs clinic mobile, cs health workers, cs other public, private hospital/clinic, private pharmacy, private doctor, cs private clilnic mobile, cs private health worker, cs private other sector, cs shop, cs traditionnel pratician, cs market, cs drugs vendor, other
  • Fever/Ari1/Ari2 treatment provider
  • Provider list being consistent with existing list: h32a-x: government hospital, health center, health post, clinique mobile, health worker, cs other public sector, private hospital/clinic, private pharmacy, private doctor, clinic mobile, community health worker, other private secotr, shop, traditional practitioner, market, drugs vendor, other
  • Fever/Fever Treatment/Cough/Cough Treatment from Full Sample: yes
  • c_diarrhea_med, medicine and formal meds to treat are survey-specific: h12z, h15, h15a-j: antibiotic pills or syrups, antimotility, antibiotic injection, intravenous (iv), home remedy & herbal medicine, zinc, other (not antibiotic, antimotility, zinc), unknown pill or syrup, non-antibiotic injection, unknown injection
  • c_diarrhea_medfor, medicine and formal meds to treat are survey-specific: h12z, h15, h15abceghij: antibiotic pills or syrups, antimotility, antibiotic injection, intravenous (iv), zinc, unknown pill or syrup, non-antibiotic injection, unknown injection
  • Validate c_ari can be generated or not: yes

• [x] Child Mortality

  • General Observations

• [x] Sleeping Under Bednet

  • Adhere to program's logic, but please list any specific bednet related observations (tricky cases for presumed treated or the like): ml0: type of mosquito bed net(s) child slept under last night. 1= only treated nets.

• [ ] Child Anthropometrics

  • General Observations (No need to generate "Wasting")

• [x] Reproductive Health

  • Contraceptive, check modern methods: v313
  • In Need - most updated version of logics in program (temporarily no actions needed)

• [x] Female Anthropometrics and Cancer Screening

  • Mammogram (X-ray, mamm...): not available
  • Pap Smear (Cervical vaginal cytology): not available
  • Note recall indicators for Mamm or Pap Smear (for example, s1012n used as filter for s1012m)

• [x] Hospitalisation, NCD & HIV

  • Hospitalisation, general observations: not available

  • Hypertension treatment , blood pressure measure in the past or during the survey, for example check hm.dta/ind.dta/men.dta (generate a_bp_treat a_bp_sys a_bp_dial a_bp_meas a_hi_bp140 a_hi_bp140_or_on_med from ind.dta & men.dta by combining them): not available

  • Note from WB team for reference: "don't worry if you cannot find men.dta, not all surveys have it. if it is collected from ind.dta and men.dta seperately (some survey have female & male questionnarie, collecting these data seperately), you will need to combine these 2 dataset, generating these indicators and merge them back to hm.dta. If only from ind.dta or men.dta, i.e. only for female or male, don't generate these variables. If a new/survey-specific datafile occurs, it is highly likely that it contains info. for 13.do. "

  • Diabetes treatment/measure in the past (for example, a_diab_treat)not available

  • HIV, general observations: not available

  • HIV questionnaire might exsit in Section 4 of "HEALTH ISSUES QUESTIONNAIRE". If they don't ask hiv test results, they are not helpful. but please document these observations.

• [x] Cross-validate statistics in survey report, if applicable. No intermediate quality control observations, since the surveyID "SN2019" is not present in the DHS.dta and HEFPI.dta.

• [x] Reference the NAME-SURVEY branch when your edits are finalised.

  • Refer to the github working branch created for [Name-SurveyName]

• [x] Update micro data in Onedrive

[wengxyu1030]

Hi Yining, thanks a lot for your pull request. Could you let us know the result of the cross-validation between statistics from your microdata output and the survey report? I see currently it's missing in the checklist.

[robin-wang]

Hi Yining and Aline, thank you for addressing the bottleneck on quality control. For the moment, let's proceed without that step.

@yining-sun I want to ask if you could modify the way checks/changes are documented.

• Now you inserted changes in the original content of this issue, and, there is a separete comment where additional changes / checks are validated.
• Would it be possible to move everything to the original checklist? You may do so by selecting "EDIT" option on that section in this issue.
• I understand the need to link your work to code update; you may leave that comment with # sign in place, but doing so with only indications of the fact that this particular survey has been sufficiently addressed, and if there are any caveats you'd like to highlight.

It would make this process super clean. Thanks for your work!

[yining-sun]

Hi Yining, thanks a lot for your pull request. Could you let us know the result of the cross-validation between statistics from your microdata output and the survey report? I see currently it's missing in the checklist.

@wengxyu1030 Hi Aline, I forgot to check that because similar to the Senegal2018 survey, there is no matched surveyid in the HEFPI.dta and DHS.dta. Therefore, there won't be any intermediate or final quality control observations.

[yining-sun]

Hi Yining and Aline, thank you for addressing the bottleneck on quality control. For the moment, let's proceed without that step.

@yining-sun I want to ask if you could modify the way checks/changes are documented.

• Now you inserted changes in the original content of this issue, and, there is a separete comment where additional changes / checks are validated.
• Would it be possible to move everything to the original checklist? You may do so by selecting "EDIT" option on that section in this issue.
• I understand the need to link your work to code update; you may leave that comment with # sign in place, but doing so with only indications of the fact that this particular survey has been sufficiently addressed, and if there are any caveats you'd like to highlight.

It would make this process super clean. Thanks for your work!

Hi Robin, I have updated the original comment accordingly and deleted the additional one. I strictly followed the previous version of work flow instructions, but I agree, this version looks cleaner.

[wengxyu1030]

Hi Yining, thanks a lot for your pull request. Could you let us know the result of the cross-validation between statistics from your microdata output and the survey report? I see currently it's missing in the checklist.

@wengxyu1030 Hi Aline, I forgot to check that because similar to the Senegal2018 survey, there is no matched surveyid in the HEFPI.dta and DHS.dta. Therefore, there won't be any intermediate or final quality control observations.

Dear Yining. Thanks for your feedback. I would clarify that this bullet point is requesting the cross-validation of statistics between the microdata you produced and the ones presented in the DHS report. For every survey, there's a report published together with the data, which you can find in the raw data folder. The report has detailed descriptions of the statistics and usually has the survey questions in the annex. This is different than the embedded quality-checking module, the module is useful in terms of cross-checking a subset of the indicators, however, there are also cases where the report contains the statistics that not incorporated in the cross-checking module in the template.

In cases like this where the embedded quality-checking module is not functioning as there are not published standardized indicator values yet from the DHS API, the survey report is particularly helpful as a reference point that it contains the statistics that you can use to cross-checking the microdata you produced.

[wengxyu1030]

There are conflicts in merge pull requests due to untimely syncing. Aline resolved manually but expects in the future that the coders could use rebase together with fetch function in GitHub desktop to keep the branch synced avoiding conflicts.

[Xian152]

@yining-sun @robin-wang Comments: Senegal2019 are quite similiar to Senegal2018, so we are encountered with similiar issues, including vaccination, c_anc_skill and c_sba.

Besides: 11.do: v106(education) =6 "other" . I haven't seen this before. No explaination of "other" in the report. I suppose we should code w_mateduc and as missing for this case. Better double check with Sven.