wengxyu1030 / MICS6

This is the repository for MICS 6
0 stars 2 forks source link

Nepal2019-JW #9

Closed robin-wang closed 3 years ago

robin-wang commented 3 years ago

WORKFLOW DOC

{FOR REVIEWERS}

{FOR CODERS} A. General Procedural Steps

B. Checklist and Guidance

feec06c8fee2cd5b384ff10027b515c
robin-wang commented 3 years ago

@jianingwwww Hey Jianing, thanks for your time just now. Here is the new assignment. Please note there are a few other surveys pending review, so when ultimately we merge your work (Nepal) into the main branch, minor harmonisation work might be needed.

Thanks so much for your work!

jianingwwww commented 3 years ago

38

wengxyu1030 commented 3 years ago

Hi @jianingwwww ,I have reviewed and merged the modified template from the pull request. Kindly compare the statistics from the quality check file to the report to make sure the indicators are not off track.

Regards, Aline

jianingwwww commented 3 years ago

Hi @jianingwwww ,I have reviewed and merged the modified template from the pull request. Kindly compare the statistics from the quality check file to the report to make sure the indicators are not off track.

Regards, Aline

Dear @wengxyu1030 ,

Apologies for the late reply! I have cross-validated applicable statistics in the report and everything looks fine except for the definition of c_measles. I found that there are MR1 and MR2 immunization in Nepal2019 (figure 1). When I searched them in the report, I saw these explanations (figure2 and 3, sorry for the inconvenience because I failed to upload the converted version to GitHub). Should I utilize variable im6m2d/m/y since MR2 seems to indicate Measles immunization coverage?

Best, Jianing

84d89446057544bd1c535bbdb78fadc 5498262d38c8f3a870a8e2c6fafc73e bcc359d5a3bb5419be6e846d9db6f6d
robin-wang commented 3 years ago

Hi @jianingwwww ,I have reviewed and merged the modified template from the pull request. Kindly compare the statistics from the quality check file to the report to make sure the indicators are not off track. Regards, Aline

Dear @wengxyu1030 ,

Apologies for the late reply! I have cross-validated applicable statistics in the report and everything looks fine except for the definition of c_measles. I found that there are MR1 and MR2 immunization in Nepal2019 (figure 1). When I searched them in the report, I saw these explanations (figure2 and 3, sorry for the inconvenience because I failed to upload the converted version to GitHub). Should I utilize variable im6m2d/m/y since MR2 seems to indicate Measles immunization coverage?

Best, Jianing

84d89446057544bd1c535bbdb78fadc 5498262d38c8f3a870a8e2c6fafc73e bcc359d5a3bb5419be6e846d9db6f6d

Hi Jianing, Thanks for checking the definition for Measles immunisation. Let's try to add im6m2x vars into the scope; it is not uncommon to have multiple indicators for immunisation status. Cheers!

robin-wang commented 3 years ago

Update and review after weight update. RW Note: polio3 shows a relatively large margin of 12.3percentage points.

Closed with this comment.

robin-wang commented 3 years ago

1023 Sven feedback polio vars dropped polio vars and full imm