werideyou / improved-accesscontrol

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/improved-accesscontrol
0 stars 0 forks source link

Nowiki transclusions #6

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
The transclusion protection code does not currently understand the <nowiki>
tag, which means that you may not be able to display an example
transclusion even within <nowiki> tags.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by eisenst...@gmail.com on 10 Nov 2008 at 7:56

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Is there a answer for that?

The same problem is with <includeonly>. 
Which means anything between <includeonly> and </includeonly> will be processed 
and displayed only when the page is being included, but not when the template 
page is being viewed directly.

It would be very helpful, if it would work O:-)

Original comment by Mediawik...@googlemail.com on 12 Dec 2011 at 4:57

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I haven't looked at this code in a few years, but it's been on the backburner 
for a while to at least update it to the latest codebase. I'll have to look at 
this specific issue in more detail, but if someone were to come up with a fix 
for it, I'd be happy to merge it in immediately.

Original comment by eisenst...@gmail.com on 12 Dec 2011 at 7:39

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Instead <nowiki>....</nowiki> you can write: 
<accesscontrol>MyGroup</accesscontrol>

But I have no idea for the <includeonly> problem :-(

Original comment by Mediawik...@googlemail.com on 13 Dec 2011 at 8:35

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
The Extension:Wiki2LaTeX supports some wiki markup.
Perhaps we can copy a part of this code, that Improved Access Control will 
support "includeonly" and "nowiki". 

http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Wiki2LaTeX/Development/w2lParser.php

Unfortunately I cannot program php and therefore I don´t know how it could 
work. 
Can you tell me if and what part of the code I will be able to insert into 
which file of Improved Access Control.

I would be very grateful !

Original comment by Mediawik...@googlemail.com on 19 Dec 2011 at 10:45