Closed sofimrtn closed 4 years ago
We should try to use EuropeanProject/NationalProject/RegionalProject whenever possible, since this is needed for many of the competency questions.
Everything looks good to me.
@spitxa do you know if we have ready the property to link projects and Research Institutes?
I would like to have projects and research institutes linked before merging this PR.
i'm hesitating about using asio:hasResearchLine as symmetric or using asio:hasResearchField to keep it differenciated.
I prefer asio:hasResearchField since it would make queries a bit easier, but I have no problem if using hasResearchLine makes more sense from an ontological perspective.
I think we need to have a way in the ontology to represent International projects like this one: https://www.cimne.com/sgp/rtd/Project.aspx?id=725
@spitxa what do you think? Or maybe these projects that are not European, National nor Regional do not need to be represented in the ontology?
added new class asio:InternationalProject to deal with consortium projects featuring partners other than from the EU.
When talking about european projects, should I just put asio:EuropeanProject or should I use both? At the moment I just used asio:Project because I wasn't sure. I will change it accordingly if needed.