Open labra opened 5 months ago
Does the SHex validator may be relevant to used for it ?
My question behind is, can we create a crate shape_validation
and shacl_validation
& shex_validation
may just use the same validator ?
In principle, it would make sense.
In SHaclEX, I tried to do that, but I was not very successful because the shaclex module depended on shex-s and shacl-s, and I think your proposal would be to have shex_validation
and shacl_validation
depend on a common module called shape_validation
, which could make sense.
My plan was to start a crate called shacl_validation
soon (mybe in two-three weeks), but if you want to start it, that would be fine.
@angelip2303 was also planning to work on it, so you could collaborate.
Yeah, would be nice to have a common module for validating Shapes, as many of the validation steps are possibly interchangeable. My plan is to start working on it as soon as I can, once I finish the course. So roughly in three weeks time I will delve into it.
I have no problem in collaborating, any help would be fantastic 😊
@angelip2303 it would be a good idea to make a board under https://github.com/weso/shapes-rs/projects and break up the work into issues/tickets this way people can see the progress and pick up work as needed
Add SHACL validation