Open willtebbutt opened 5 years ago
@willtebbutt That sounds very sensible to me. How would f1.mul_approx(f2)
or f1.mul_matched(f2)
sound? Do you perhaps have a suggestion for a name?
I don't have any particular suggestion for a name here. mul_approx
seems a bit too general to me, so I think that I prefer mul_matched
.
Perfect! Let's go with mul_matched
then. I'll incorporate the change in the 1.0 release.
Currently multiplication between GPs works. What are the odds of renaming this functionality to prevent users from multiplying GPs and getting unexpected results?