Open shawnthompson opened 7 years ago
I would say to modify the existing blurb with a more useful information.
If we have a problem with it's default look, we should be changing it in the CSS for WET but I wouldn't recommend changing the standard browser presentation of this element.
I agree
For discussion
<ins>
? <del>
? <ins>
and <del>
are used in a list or a table? (https://www.w3.org/TR/html52/edits.html#edits)Note how opening an HTML doc in MS Word changes the styles of <ins>
and <del>
in the following image. Not only do they use the usual underlining and strikethrough, but they also colour the text to show that it's something different.
A background colour could also be used to ensure sufficient contrast. Of course, using green and red somewhere here comes to mind.
I've also seen a dotted underline used for <ins>
to make it distinct from a link, and the text "(Updated)" or "(Updated 2017-05-19 08:33 EST)" placed after.
On the Text editing effects: Inserted text page, would should remove the blurb about not using this element.
ins
should be used if text was changed and inserted into a page. This is semantics and should be marked up properly.If we have a problem with it's default look, we should be changing it in the CSS for WET but I wouldn't recommend changing the standard browser presentation of this element.