search

wetube / bitcloud

Bitcloud Project
http://bitcloudproject.org
MIT License
613 stars 56 forks source link

Added sections to economical proposal #24

Closed cromestant closed 10 years ago

cromestant commented 10 years ago

No seing a clear commit however no conflicts on my end. I added some information hope to expand it as soon as I have some more time. including: new structure of the document with 3 types. added services section. rephrased a few things.

JaviLib commented 10 years ago

After reading more closely, the origin certification, do we really need so? Everything is signed by the author anyway.

cromestant commented 10 years ago

It is a valid point, I saw it as a "premium" transaction for generating cash circulation. In essence I create "A". and I want to "sell" "A" in bitcloud ( lets keep the book analogy). I contact publisher "BOOX!" and ask them to host and sell "A". "BOOX" and I get a share of the sales.

What happens if in the future I see "A" being sold by "OTHERBOOKS" and not giving me my share? the idea was just to include a certification ( or trust chain) that would become law, if "A" is mine (certified by the bitcloud) then "OTHERBOOKS" would/could be liable (automatic compensation?).

might be overkill, or it might be very too much trouble for the problem being fixed.

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 5:10 PM, JavierRSobrino notifications@github.comwrote:

After reading more closely, the origin certification, do we really need so? Everything is signed by the author anyway.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/wetube/bitcloud/pull/24#issuecomment-33174802 .

MSc. Charles M. Romestant F.

Merci de penser à l'environnement avant d'imprimer cet e-mail Please think about the environment before you print this e-mail Por favor piense en el medio ambiente antes de imprimir este e-mail

JaviLib commented 10 years ago

It is a good idea, and will be implemented. But I don't think that it should be explained in the economic model, but in the protocol. I have to write the "content" section of the protocol and should be there. Note that we shall check the sha256 of every file to detect repeated content anyway.

Thanks!

El 23/01/14 23:40, cromestant escribió:

It is a valid point, I saw it as a "premium" transaction for generating cash circulation. In essence I create "A". and I want to "sell" "A" in bitcloud ( lets keep the book analogy). I contact publisher "BOOX!" and ask them to host and sell "A". "BOOX" and I get a share of the sales.

What happens if in the future I see "A" being sold by "OTHERBOOKS" and not giving me my share? the idea was just to include a certification ( or trust chain) that would become law, if "A" is mine (certified by the bitcloud) then "OTHERBOOKS" would/could be liable (automatic compensation?).

might be overkill, or it might be very too much trouble for the problem being fixed.

JaviLib commented 10 years ago

Thank you, I have deleted the file because we have a better consensus on the economics now. You can check the channel #bitcloud-dev and the forum where we are talking a lot about this.