For Wezterm's SplitVertical and SplitHorizontal features, for instance, if I first use SplitHorizontal, panes 1 and 2 will divide the screen equally, but if I continue to SplitHorizontal under pane 2, pane 2 and pane 3 will only occupy 1/4 of the screen each, rather than 1/3.
In Tabby, it automatically lets three panes each occupy 1/3 of the screen equally.
I've observed that the pane splitting logic in tmux is the same as in Wezterm, and the window splitting logic in vim is the same as in Tabby.
However, from the standpoint of screen utilization, perhaps the Tabby style of equal division might be better?
Of course, this might just be a difference in user habits, and Wezterm may have its own design philosophy that I am not aware of.
drinktee
commented
4 months ago
For Wezterm's SplitVertical and SplitHorizontal features, for instance, if I first use SplitHorizontal, panes 1 and 2 will divide the screen equally, but if I continue to SplitHorizontal under pane 2, pane 2 and pane 3 will only occupy 1/4 of the screen each, rather than 1/3.
In Tabby, it automatically lets three panes each occupy 1/3 of the screen equally.
I've observed that the pane splitting logic in tmux is the same as in Wezterm, and the window splitting logic in vim is the same as in Tabby.
However, from the standpoint of screen utilization, perhaps the Tabby style of equal division might be better?
Of course, this might just be a difference in user habits, and Wezterm may have its own design philosophy that I am not aware of.