I write you because I am looking into which tables to associate to the VMC DR7 and found that it would be good to associate some of the tables that resulted from your work and the work by Marco.
The first question is, are there sources in common between the two studies? I have not re-read the paper, but by just looking at the figures these would be only a handful.
The parameters in common between the two tables with the parameters are Ra, Dec, mass-loss rate, luminosity. However, while the 202 also quotes uncertainties the 2012 does not. In the latter this is more or less encoded into other columns, the optical depth is also given in this work.
Would you produce a merged table with the parameters of the LPVs, not all of them need to be included, but just what makes sense for as much consistency as possible.
Best would be if you can do that next week and send it to both myself (for description into the paper) and Nick (for inclusion into DR7), but you need more time let me know!
I write you because I am looking into which tables to associate to the VMC DR7 and found that it would be good to associate some of the tables that resulted from your work and the work by Marco.
The first question is, are there sources in common between the two studies? I have not re-read the paper, but by just looking at the figures these would be only a handful.
My suggestion is to include a table with the results of the light-curve analysis, the same as table 3 available at CDS from https://vizier.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/VizieR-3?-source=J/A%2bA/636/A48/tablea3 from Groenewegen et al. 2020.
To Nick: is the Vizier link above sufficient to retrieve the information you need for including the table into the VMC DR7?
I would also include a table with the properties of the LPV candidates, this would be a merged table between https://vizier.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/VizieR-3?-source=J/A%2bA/636/A48/tabled1 (from Groenewegen et al. 2020) and https://vizier.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/VizieR-3?-source=J/A%2bA/537/A105/results (from Gullieuszik et al. 2012).
The parameters in common between the two tables with the parameters are Ra, Dec, mass-loss rate, luminosity. However, while the 202 also quotes uncertainties the 2012 does not. In the latter this is more or less encoded into other columns, the optical depth is also given in this work.
Would you produce a merged table with the parameters of the LPVs, not all of them need to be included, but just what makes sense for as much consistency as possible.
Best would be if you can do that next week and send it to both myself (for description into the paper) and Nick (for inclusion into DR7), but you need more time let me know!