wforney / morelinq

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/morelinq
Apache License 2.0
0 stars 0 forks source link

Review: MoreEnumerable.Segment() #45

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Purpose of code changes on this branch:

Rev 136: Implementation of the Segment operator which transforms a sequence
int a series of sequence that divide up the elements of the original
sequence. Segment uses a caller-supplied segmentation detector which
informs Segment when an element should begin a new segment. Overloads exist
which supply the segmentation detector with an element, or an element and
its zero-based index, or an element, previous element and index.
Individuals segments are buffered, but the overall operation is performed
in a streaming fashion - segments never visited are not computed.

When reviewing my code changes, please focus on:

* The public interface of the extension method.
* The effectiveness and clarity of the available XML comment documentation.
* How well this operator fits into the MoreLINQ ecosystem of
extension methods.
* The extent of coverage available from the corresponding unit tests.
* Whether edge cases are correctly identified and handled in the
implementation and tests.

After the review, I'll merge this branch into:
/trunk

Original issue reported on code.google.com by ambientl...@gmail.com on 23 Jan 2010 at 5:13

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Now migrated to Hg and available in clone:
http://code.google.com/r/azizatif-morelinq-evenmore/
This clone is ready to be cloned :O) for further review. It also has the 
main/default branch already merged in to bring it up to date.

Original comment by azizatif on 25 May 2012 at 11:38

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by azizatif on 3 Jun 2012 at 8:14

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
May be redundant with Split.

Original comment by azizatif on 3 Jun 2012 at 9:12

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Following no response from ambientlion (who possibly/assuming lost interest 
given it has taken years to get this far), taking ownership of issue to 
consider as addition for MoreLINQ 2.0 milestone.

Original comment by azizatif on 12 Jun 2013 at 10:10

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
This issue was closed by revision ecbb044b3f86.

Original comment by azizatif on 14 Jun 2013 at 5:18