Open bmeurer opened 1 month ago
@domfarolino Let's get the ball rolling here. :muscle:
@and-oli Please loop in your contacts with other browser vendors here.
Hmm, it looks like you removed this line about tests from the pull request template? Can you add that back and maybe write some tests for this API? You can follow the pattern in https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/tree/master/console. Note the state of testing is a little sad at this point, since these are basically just manual tests :(
@dcrousso @nchevobbe
Hmm, it looks like you removed this line about tests from the pull request template? Can you add that back and maybe write some tests for this API? You can follow the pattern in https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/tree/master/console. Note the state of testing is a little sad at this point, since these are basically just manual tests :(
Beyond testing that the function exists on the console
object, how would we go about adding other (meaningful) tests?
Hmm, it looks like you removed this line about tests from the pull request template? Can you add that back and maybe write some tests for this API? You can follow the pattern in https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/tree/master/console. Note the state of testing is a little sad at this point, since these are basically just manual tests :(
Beyond testing that the function exists on the
console
object, how would we go about adding other (meaningful) tests?
@domfarolino any thoughts here?
This adds a minimal (vague) definition for the
timeStamp()
method, based on its current behavior across Chromium, Firefox, and Safari, and the MDN documentation^1.Ref: #140
Preview | Diff