whatwg / fetch

Fetch Standard
https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/
Other
2.1k stars 325 forks source link

Anchor permanence for integration with compression dictionary spec? #1771

Open pmeenan opened 2 weeks ago

pmeenan commented 2 weeks ago

What is the issue with the Fetch Standard?

As per https://whatwg.org/working-mode#anchors could we please make the following anchors permanent?

These are used by the compression dictionary IETF spec.

domenic commented 2 weeks ago

I think https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-request-destination might be better than the enum?

Anyway let's remember to use https://speced.github.io/bikeshed/#metadata-required-ids to enforce this.

pmeenan commented 2 weeks ago

Thanks. I'll update the draft to use concept-request-destination instead.

annevk commented 2 weeks ago

When will Compression Dictionary be more properly integrated with Fetch? It seems this could be done as part of that.

pmeenan commented 2 weeks ago

I'm starting to work on a PR now. I can include the chance as part of the PR if we think we will be able to land the integration based on browser interest and without a second implementation.

On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 2:31 AM Anne van Kesteren @.***> wrote:

When will Compression Dictionary be more properly integrated with Fetch? It seems this could be done as part of that.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/1771#issuecomment-2316813740, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADMOBLQEEV2WQ4MHRPOVF3ZT253RAVCNFSM6AAAAABNIW7B7CVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGMJWHAYTGNZUGA . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>

annevk commented 2 weeks ago

Our process does not require two implementations. See https://whatwg.org/working-mode#changes.