Open KurtCattiSchmidt opened 1 day ago
This seems related to my objections in #10673. Ideally you would not be using the module map infrastructure at all, and instead using pure URLs. Then #fragment
URLs could reference inline style sheets identified by id=""
.
What is the issue with the HTML Standard?
This topic is for discussion of #10673, which is a Stage 1 proposal.
The current explainer uses URL-like module syntax to define a module identifier. The TPAC breakout session had some discussion around initiating a network fetch for the given module name if one hasn't been defined declaratively.
Specifically, this would mean that specifying the following markup:
without an existing definition of
foo.css
in the module graph would:adoptedStyleSheets
in the provided<template>
elementThis would essentially be a markup-equivalent of https://web.dev/articles/css-module-scripts
Is this something that is desired by developers? If so, there are a number of follow-up issues to clarify, but I want to determine fetching in general makes sense with this feature.