Closed annevk closed 4 years ago
+1 for hardcoding months; I like the predictability, and it might even be information we want to surface somewhere someday (e.g. on https://whatwg.org/workstreams)
Months are part of db.json now. The way I was thinking of taking this further in July:
make preview
into this script rather than have that spread out across our various standards.cc @foolip
@foolip (and @domenic) this is now updated to take into account the updated db.json. We could try it out on Monday. Suggestions and such welcome as well as thoughts on the "Optionally" above and the things called out in comments.
I guess the problem with makeGroupsOfFive is that if we add a standard while the current process is still ongoing, it might cause another standard to be published again a month later. So maybe @foolip's approach of hardcoding months (see https://github.com/whatwg/sg/issues/127) in db.json is the way to go.