Discussed the PR describing how we make policy changes and whether an exception to the 45 day period is really needed: conclusion we might not need to specify an exception.
Looked over the PR for re-linking and bolding a few terms in the IPR policy and the two SG members present concluded that this would be OK to merge and approved. Reaching out to other SG member for their consensus.
Reviewed proposed terminology changes to the "Workstream Participant Invitation Policy" to "Invited Individual Policy" PR 158. Goes together with PR 170 in the participate repo. The term "Invited Individual" was already defined in the Workstream Agreement, and we are proposing to move the definition to the policy document and link to it from the agreement. There is also one tweak about using "term" versus "status" that needs to be reviewed.
Present @foolip @travisleithead
Merged PR created by Philip to add TestUtils Workstream to WHATWG
Discussed the PR describing how we make policy changes and whether an exception to the 45 day period is really needed: conclusion we might not need to specify an exception.
Looked over the PR for re-linking and bolding a few terms in the IPR policy and the two SG members present concluded that this would be OK to merge and approved. Reaching out to other SG member for their consensus.
Reviewed proposed terminology changes to the "Workstream Participant Invitation Policy" to "Invited Individual Policy" PR 158. Goes together with PR 170 in the participate repo. The term "Invited Individual" was already defined in the Workstream Agreement, and we are proposing to move the definition to the policy document and link to it from the agreement. There is also one tweak about using "term" versus "status" that needs to be reviewed.